|
Published
Monday, June 25, 2007
Print
Friendly Version Email
This
Be optimistic, yes, but have insurance
by Stephen Butler
"It's dangerous to make predictions -- especially about
the future."
Everyone from Mark Twain to Yogi Berra is given credit for that
line. Meanwhile, what a difference a week makes.
Last week, I was just a nattering nabob of negativism with regard
to the economic impact of rising interest rates. Searching for
good news to lift me out of my funk, I found plenty of offsetting
optimism in columns like that of Paul Lim in the New York Times,
as well as the informative bulletin from the ubiquitous Ken Fisher.
Then, there's always Bob Brinker and Norm Fosbach.
Last week, I pointed out that rising interest rates are bad because
corporate bottom lines and consumer spending power both decline.
This is bad for both the economy and the stock market.
For the past several years, bond traders and investors have been
buying 10-year bonds that paid only 4 percent interest, because
they felt that the economy was going to be weak in years to come.
With a weak economy, there wouldn't be much of a demand for borrowed
money, so interest rates would remain low for at least 10 more
years.
As a general rule, bond traders have tended to be the best predictors
of future events when compared with economists or stock analysts.
The counterintuitive view is that the robust economy is the reason
bond traders now want to dump those bonds paying just 4 percent,
because the new rate is 5 percent and rising.
So, the question is this: "Will a robust economy and continually
growing corporate revenues be enough to offset the cost of higher
interest rates? And, will higher interest rates lead to a slowdown
of consumer spending, leading to an economic downturn?"
Now for some "happy talk." Fisher points out that corporate
profits have been growing more rapidly than stock prices have
been appreciating. If interest rates and corporate profits remain
constant, stocks would appreciate by 70 percent before reaching
their historical price relationship when compared to bond values.
Another factor, which every optimist cites, is that corporations
are buying back their own stock because they think it is underpriced.
This increases the value of the stock that is left.
Let's use a simple example: A company worth $1 million and owned
by 10 $100,000 investors happens to have $200,000 sitting in cash
as a result of two profitable years. If it uses the $200,000 to
buy out two of the investors, the remaining stockholders who owned
80 percent now own 100 percent of the same $1 million of value.
This increases the value of investors' shares to $125,000. Across
corporate America, this practice has been happening with a vengeance
as corporations buy their own publicly traded stock and then retire
it to create capital gains for the remaining stockholders.
The dark side of this practice is that it increases values for
executives who have been granted stock options, so their motivation
may be suspect.
Fisher points out that a bull market feeds on what he would probably
term "a superficial aura of pessimism" -- like my column
of last week -- while underappreciated positive fundamentals continue
to prevail.
The fundamentals he cites are: Stocks are still cheap relative
to profits; the global economy is thriving; the world is awash
in cash that will keep interest rates low; and corporate buybacks
are reducing the supply of available stock.
Moreover, subprime mortgage market worries are overblown, and
most of the geopolitical threats have already been "discounted"
into the current stock prices. "Discounting" means that
the probable impact of a future event already has been reflected
in the price for a stock.
For the most part, then, some of the most respected market sages
are telling us that the market will continue to rise for the next
five years. As a group, they seem to predict that total increases
will be as much as 50 percent during that time.
The question I have is: "What if they're wrong?" I
like knowing that I have some "insurance" in the form
of large value-oriented mutual funds and short-term bond funds.
I can pass up some of those possible gains in exchange for a better
night's sleep.
|
Searching for Something? 
Simply enter a keyword or topic to find the expert tip, services or news you are looking for!
News 
Sign me up for your Newsletter (or make other subscription changes)
401(k) Today 
Designing, Maintaining and Maximizing Your Company’s Plan
Looking for in-depth information on how to design, maintain and maximize your organization’s 401K plan?
Then 401(k) Today by Stephen Butler is the practical, easy-to-read guide for you!
To order your copy today, please call Pension Dynamics at (925) 956-0505
|