|
Published
Monday, January 28, 2008
Print
Friendly Version Email
This
Self-reliance is key to success
by Stephen Butler
My friend Bill Southard was at West Point in 1974 and heard novelist
Ayn Rand give a commencement speech titled, "Philosophy,
Who Needs It?"
He sent me a copy of her speech, which basically said we all
need a personal philosophy, and that without one, we will be slapped
around by events. My late mother-in-law described the condition
(and all of California, for that matter) as having "no roots."
Most of us like to think we have what we would call an investment
philosophy, so in the light of the current turmoil, let's see
how we're holding up.
To try to make sense of our current mess, I considered reading
Alan Greenspan's autobiography. But first, I thought it might
be worth it to summon up my old Evelyn Wood speed-reading skills
and skim through Ayn Rand's 1,100-page novel, "Atlas Shrugged."
It's my second reading in 40 years. Why? Because Greenspan, in
his early years, was an acolyte of Rand's, and deep down inside
he harbors a basic distrust of government intervention.
The Rand books, "Atlas Shrugged" and "The Fountainhead,"
convey the message that lone individualists (today's entrepreneurs)
bucking the system have to struggle against near-impossible odds.
To the extent they succeed, there can be no greater hero.
Coupled with this is the notion that no bureaucratic organization
can possibly function effectively, because they are all riddled
with greed and the collective self-interests of individual bureaucrats.
Rand isn't limiting her venom to government agencies. Today she
would find large companies in collusion with the government, such
as drug companies and the military-industrial complex, to be equally
complicit in limiting our freedoms and success as a society.
So, where does Greenspan fit into all this? We know that the
economy is like a spider web and that touching one strand shakes
the whole web.
The Greenspan impression was that there was no problem with subprime
loans, even though he had been warned that lending standards were
being widely violated. Even our new, more cerebral Fed chairman,
Ben Bernanke, was initially quoted as saying he thought the subprime
situation would have minimal effects.
Both probably felt that a few banks and investors getting singed
would set in motion a natural process that would self-correct
the problem. That, plus a lot of litigation maybe, but nothing
would require the "boogie man" of government intervention.
Well, both gurus have turned out to be wrong, so what does this
all mean for us "little people"?
The effort right now is to reduce interest rates to stimulate
the economy, and this is exactly what President Roosevelt directed
the Fed to do to finance World War II.
Then, of course, we had inflation, but it was seen as the lesser
of evils. If I had to guess, I would say that we will once again
be paying off our massive current debt, sooner or later, with
a big dose of inflation. Inflation makes government debt cheaper
to pay back, and like mutual fund expense ratios, few people ever
receive a bill or have to write a check for the debt that inflation
reduces; only people on fixed incomes will get hit, such as retired
baby boomers.
Philosophically, I believe that individual investors have to
fend for themselves. I don't have much confidence in any moves
that the Federal Reserve or Congress might make to stimulate the
domestic economy. The fact that huge amounts of money have been
pouring into international and emerging markets mutual funds indicates
to me that many of my fellow Americans are voting with their feet.
At the moment, I think there's a sense that other governments
and their economies are better run than ours. If that's true,
it would seem reasonable to have a little more money invested
overseas.
On the other hand, General Electric is predicting 10 percent
growth in profit for 2008 based on worldwide sales. The emergence
of so-called "mega-cap" mutual funds investing solely
in our largest companies is confirming that companies large enough
to have substantial overseas markets will benefit from inflation
and a falling dollar.
Meanwhile, the dividend at Citicorp, assuming it doesn't get
cut, amounts to a 5.2 percent return right now. Its new preferred
stock is yielding 8 percent. In short, there's still plenty of
opportunity for us junior Warren Buffetts.
My basic investment philosophy involves staying diversified and
nudging a little money here and there where I think there might
be opportunity in an inevitable inflationary environment.
Having lived 30 years ago through the days of "stagflation,"
(inflation coupled with recession) and having saved my "WIN"
button (Whip Inflation Now), I have no illusions of any successful
outcome resulting from the Fed or congressional action.
|
Searching for Something? 
Simply enter a keyword or topic to find the expert tip, services or news you are looking for!
News 
Sign me up for your Newsletter (or make other subscription changes)
401(k) Today 
Designing, Maintaining and Maximizing Your Company’s Plan
Looking for in-depth information on how to design, maintain and maximize your organization’s 401K plan?
Then 401(k) Today by Stephen Butler is the practical, easy-to-read guide for you!
To order your copy today, please call Pension Dynamics at (925) 956-0505
|